What photos and/or content of mass shootings are considered "appropriate"/ ethical for newspapers and social media accounts to publish? Should there only be a "graphic" warning if there's sign of blood? Should faces of the victims at the scene be blurred? Should they post the horrific videos that say an individual posted on their Twitter account?
Here are a few examples of the Las Vegas shooting where publications have published each of the conditions mentioned above:
What boundaries would you or would you not cross in terms of covering a tragedy like this in order to write a compelling story?
No comments:
Post a Comment