Anyway, the ethical aspect? The photographer admires the man. He sees
him shot down. He takes the picture. He is not the one kneeling beside
the man he admires. He does his job, which is not to intervene but to
take the picture. Note the very last sentence.
3 comments:
Maybe he wanted to make the most ethical and sincere story of the man he admires. He needed the picture, but we can't judge what he was feeling at the moment
That is true. He may have been in shock and simply reacted. He may have thought fast and concluded there was nothing he could do. Subsequent events - it turned out there was nothing he could have done - may influence our judgment.
Post a Comment